61
understanding the lease object. The
Company takes into consideration both
quantitative and qualitative factors when
assessing the creditworthiness of the
customer. Based on
this analysis, the Company sets the credit limit for each and every customer.
When the lease agreement has been signed, the Company monitors the lease
object and customer’s solvency. The Company has developed lease monitoring
process so that it
helps
to
quickly
spot
any
possible
non-compliance
with
the
provisions
of
the
agreement.
The
receivable balances
are
monitored
on
an
ongoing
basis
to
ensure
that
the
Company’s exposure to bad debts is minimized, and, where appropriate, sufficient provisions are being made.
The Company does not have a significant credit risk exposure to any single counterparty, but has risk to group of counterparties having similar characteristics.
See Notes 18 and 19 for more information.
Excessive risk concentration
Concentrations arise when a number of counterparties are engaged in similar business activities, or activities in the same geographical region, or have similar economic features
that would
cause their
ability to
meet contractual
obligations to be
similarly affected
by changes
in economic,
political or
other conditions.
Concentrations indicate the
relative
sensitivity of the Company’s performance to developments affecting a particular industry or geographical location.
In order to
avoid excessive concentrations of
risk, the Company
is maintaining a diversified
portfolio. It’s main
product is subprime lease,
however it is
offering also near
prime
lease, as well as loans and advances to customers.
40. Fair value of financial assets and liabilities
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair
value measurement is based on the presumption that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability takes
place either:
- In the principal market for the asset or liability; or
- In the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market for the asset or liability.
The principal or the most advantageous
market must be accessible by the Company.
The fair value of an asset or a liability is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability,
assuming that market participants
act in their economic best interest. A fair
value measurement of a non-financial asset takes into account a
market participant's ability to generate economic benefits by using the
asset in its highest and
best use or by
selling it to another market participant
that would use the asset
in its highest and best
use. The Company uses valuation
techniques that
are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximizing the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizing the use of
unobservable inputs. All
assets and liabilities
for which fair
value is
measured or disclosed
in the separate
financial statements are
categorized within the
fair value hierarchy,
described as follows, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole:
- Level 1 - Quoted (unadjusted) market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
- Level 2 - Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement is directly or indirectly observable
- Level 3 - Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement is unobservable.
Instruments within Level 1 include highly liquid cash and cash equivalent assets and standard derivative
financial instruments
traded on the stock exchange.
Fair value
for such
financial instruments
as
Financial assets
at fair
value
through profit
and loss
is mainly
determined based
on publicly
available quoted
prices (bid
price,
obtainable from Bloomberg system).
Instruments within Level 2
include assets, for
which no active
market exists, such as
over the counter
financial instruments that are
traded outside the stock
exchange, bonds.
Bonds fair value is observable in Frankfurt Stock Exchange/ Nasdaq Riga Stock Exchange public information.
Instruments within Level 3 include loans and finance lease receivables, other trade receivables,
current and non-current borrowings and trade and other trade payables.
Fair value of current and non-current borrowings is based on cash flows discounted using effective agreement interest rate which represents current market rate. The Company's
management believes that interest rates applicable to loan portfolio and borrowings are in line with current market
interest rates for companies similar to Mogo JSC.
Fair value of finance lease and loan receivables is equal to the carrying value, which is present value of minimum lease and loan payments discounted using effective agreement
interest rate and adjusted for impairment allowance.
Fair value of finance lease receivables and loans and advances to customers is determined using discounted cash flow model consisting of contractual lease and loan cash flows
that are adjusted by expectations about possible variations in
the amount and timings of cash flows using methodology consistent with
the expected credit loss determination as
at 31 December 2021 to
determine the cash flows expected
to be received net of
impairment losses. The pre-tax weighted average
cost of capital (WACC) of
the entity holding
the respective financial assets is
used as the basis for
the discount rate. The WACC
is based on the actual
estimated cost of equity and
cost of debt that reflect
any other risks
relevant to
the
leases
and
loans
that
have
not been
taken into
consideration by
the
impairment loss
adjustment described
above and
also
includes compensation
for
the
opportunity cost of
establishing a similar
lease or loan. An
additional 1.5% is
added to the
discount rate as
an adjustment to
consider service costs of
the portfolio that
are not
captured by the cash flow adjustments.
The annual
discount rate
was determined
as 12,18%
(2020: 13.59%).
Impairment loss
is estimated
by applying
PD and
LGD rates,
which are
in line
with ECL
methodology
described under 'The calculation of ECLs' (Note 2).
The management recognizes that if
a fair value of
such assets/liabilities would be assessed as
an amount at which an
asset could be exchanged
or liability settled on an
arm’s
length basis with knowledgeable third parties, the fair values obtained of the respective assets and liabilities
would not be materially different.
For assets and liabilities that are recognized in the separate financial statements on a recurring basis, the Company determines whether transfers have occurred between Levels